This one is simply too big to miss and too important to not address. The Guardian has a good summary article (shared by @homankev) Apple, Google and Twitter among 22 tech companies opposing Cisa bill. This goes hand-in-hand with the case that is now being engaged in Irish Courts surrounding FaceBook among others standing accused of sharing just the sort of information that CISA seeks to allow – in direct contravention of the Safe Harbour policy. IS it possible to expect any personal privacy in the digital age?
In the past we have had websites and services such as pleaserobme.com that attempted to alert the public to the ways in which greater online and social media vigilance is required to protect ourselves. Recent studies have pointed out vulnerabilities and the potential for malware to snoop on spoken credit card numbers or to capture keystrokes tapped on the screen. Now we have a fascinating and scary paper published at Cornell exploring the ways in which augmented reality on smartphones is being employed to maliciously use the camera and other sensors to create a surreptitious virtual picture of your physical enviromnment enabling others to virtually steal financial documents or snoop informatoon displayed on computer screens. They demonstrate an application called PlaceRaider that conducts remote reconnaisance and also suggest ways that we can protect ourselves from such a threat.
In an intriguing (largely insofar it is necessary) the EU Parliament has called for hard rules to strengthen the accountability of EU-based companies that export tools that can be used to block websites and monitor mobile communications. Laudable definitely. Enforceable – maybe??
According to a new report by the ISACA, ‘Nearly 60 percent of smartphone users employ apps that access their location data despite having concerns about risks to their privacy and even personal safety.’ So basically although they know the risks, people weigh them and consider the benefits worthwhile. Or do they? Do people really get it? Are they really aware of the risks. It’s intriguing that many people are more concerned about the inconvenience of having advertisers drown them with offers than those with criminal intent mining the social media and using geolocation apps to target victims. What do you think??
I wanted to briefly carry on our discussion on data privacy issues and our thoughts on how companies datamine purchase data to profile and predict your buying patterns and possibly pinpoint future needs and wants. This short article appeared in Forbes claiming that Target (the US retailer) figured out his 16 year old daughter was pregnant before he did.The larger article speaks to the ways in which Target in particular mines individual customer purchases through their loyalty card programme by running it through specific BI profiling tools to deduce very specific future buying needs and to invent customer purchasing at Target. This is of even greater has even greater velocity when we consider the impact of geolocation services next week.
Twitter now able to censor tweets on a country by country basis.
According to this report from Marketing Land, Twitter has technically added the capability to turn off accounts or feeds – if required by law – on a country by country basis. Seems rather ironic after tonight discussion during lecture on the technical requirements to meet the proposed Irish legislation.
This thoughtful piece from the BMW Guggenheim Lab Blog discusses the way in which participatory cartography is changing the way in which we perceive our cities. Christine McLaren argues in New cartographers: How citizen mapmakers are changing the story of our lives that the popular availability of open data about social use of space is gaining widespread popular appeal and altering the way in which we interact with place and with others through location.
An article from Time Magazine that explores some of the services that mine and sell personal details. Quite interesting reading: Data Mining: How companies know everything about you.